How is it that the Joker movie wasn't canceled

Joker sequel due to incredible success: the cancellation couldn't be clearer

Joker 2 is only conceivable with Joaquin Phoenix, if at all. It's just stupid that the actor categorically excludes a sequel. Read his understandable reasons here

Great success equals continuation. The market logic of blockbuster cinema is as simple as it is predictable. With Joker, however, an uncontrollable element has crept into the world of cinematic universes, sequels and spin-offs in recent weeks. Nobody foresaw the success of Joker to this extent.

The great success of Joker in numbers

Joker has now grossed 850 million US dollars, more than any other film with an R rating, i.e. with an age limit of 16 years and over, the audience mass and thus the chances of success. Joker is one of the most successful films of the year, political debates are swirling around him, he has Oscar chances and we, too, sincerely wish for a continuation.

Joaquin Phoenix categorically rules out a sequel

In Joker 2, Joaquin Phoenix would have to be pushed under threat of severe physical violence. The lead actor gave the Los Angeles Times an interview in which he made it clear that he was opposed to complying with market laws.

I wouldn't do a sequel just because the first film was a success. That's ridiculous.

What is normal in Hollywood seems completely absurd to Joaquin Phoenix from an artistic point of view.

No Joker Sequel: The Most Important Reasons

In fact, Phoenix was just seduced by the idea of ​​making a stand-alone film for DC. So he was attracted by DC's new strategy, which, probably successfully, runs contrary to the Cinematic Universe solution from Marvel and Disney. Phoenix did before rejected many comic roles for fear of becoming a cog in a cinema machine.

The statements of Joaquin Phoenix about a Joker sequel in wording:

  • "I think it was the fear that you get locked up and always having to do something that you are not interested in, that does not motivate or excite you. "
  • "Part of the attraction [Joker] had on me was that it was gave no expectations. I didn't get a deal on multiple films. It should only be one. "

In the MCU, for example, it is common for actors like Chris Hemsworth (Thor) or Paul Rudd (Ant-Man) to sign contracts in which appearances in solo films, cameos in ensemble films or spin-offs are clearly itemized. Only in this way can the continuous establishment of large film universes be reliably realized.

Joker, though derived from superhero and comic DNA, exists outside of this world. Joaquin Phoenix could hardly have put it more clearly: We can get rid of a sequel.

Are you happy with the one single Joker movie?